<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook vs. MySpace: A Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluefuego.com/index.php/2009/04/facebook-vs-myspace-a-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluefuego.com/index.php/2009/04/facebook-vs-myspace-a-comparison/</link>
	<description>Web-Based Higher Education Marketing and Recruitment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rothbaum</title>
		<link>http://bluefuego.com/index.php/2009/04/facebook-vs-myspace-a-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rothbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluefuego.com/?p=237#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you, Brad. From my conversations with college admission offices, Facebook is the social network they are thinking about the most. One school even said its only concern with MySpace is having pages taken down that claim to represent the school yet are not affiliated with the school in any way.

Additionally, the data about traffic in the NACAC report is a bit out of date. Facebook recently eclipsed 200 million users worldwide. All the indicators seem to be pointing toward Facebook as the dominant social network. I think it&#039;s somewhat akin to Google in the search engine market. Facebook wasn&#039;t the first social network, but it seems to have become the standard. MySpace could be considered the Yahoo (and Friendster, the first social network, might be something like Lycos, if you remember them).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you, Brad. From my conversations with college admission offices, Facebook is the social network they are thinking about the most. One school even said its only concern with MySpace is having pages taken down that claim to represent the school yet are not affiliated with the school in any way.</p>
<p>Additionally, the data about traffic in the NACAC report is a bit out of date. Facebook recently eclipsed 200 million users worldwide. All the indicators seem to be pointing toward Facebook as the dominant social network. I think it&#8217;s somewhat akin to Google in the search engine market. Facebook wasn&#8217;t the first social network, but it seems to have become the standard. MySpace could be considered the Yahoo (and Friendster, the first social network, might be something like Lycos, if you remember them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally Rubenstone</title>
		<link>http://bluefuego.com/index.php/2009/04/facebook-vs-myspace-a-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Rubenstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluefuego.com/?p=237#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Never mind Facebook vs. MySpace ... what I didn&#039;t get is how a 41-page report on &quot;Reaching the Wired Generation: How Social Media is Changing College Admission&quot; could overlook College Confidential. Granted, CC doesn&#039;t get the traffic that Facebook and My Space receive ... not even close ... but CC&#039;s 1.3 million visitors and 36 million page views last month alone is nothing to sneeze at. And the BIG difference is that virtually everyone who goes to CC is looking for college information. Many teens tell me that they hit Facebook, MySpace, et al to get *away* from it ... well, at least to take a break from the demands of their academic lives. 

So, if college admission officials and marketing mavens want to reach their target audiences (prospective students and parents) at not only a place that they&#039;re sure to be but also at a *time* that they&#039;re eager to &quot;listen,&quot; then College Confidential is a far wiser choice. 

Yes, I do work for College Confidential, but this rant is more than just a shameless plug. I am proud that the information on the College Confidential discussion forum is often surprisingly accurate, especially for reader-generated content. But certainly the CC community could benefit from more participation by NACAC members, just as NACAC-affiliated colleges could benefit from the recruitment possibilities that CC provides. We at CC would like to see far more college officials actively participating in our discussions, helping us to offer the best information possible, and acknowledging the role that CC plays in helping many families shape their college plans.

This study that you cite spotlights other commercial ventures but not CC. Thus, NACAC members are missing out on an important opportunity to learn about an exceptional resource and perhaps the most effective way to reach the &quot;Wired Generation&quot;--better than MySpace and Facebook when it comes to connecting with the college bound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind Facebook vs. MySpace &#8230; what I didn&#8217;t get is how a 41-page report on &#8220;Reaching the Wired Generation: How Social Media is Changing College Admission&#8221; could overlook College Confidential. Granted, CC doesn&#8217;t get the traffic that Facebook and My Space receive &#8230; not even close &#8230; but CC&#8217;s 1.3 million visitors and 36 million page views last month alone is nothing to sneeze at. And the BIG difference is that virtually everyone who goes to CC is looking for college information. Many teens tell me that they hit Facebook, MySpace, et al to get *away* from it &#8230; well, at least to take a break from the demands of their academic lives. </p>
<p>So, if college admission officials and marketing mavens want to reach their target audiences (prospective students and parents) at not only a place that they&#8217;re sure to be but also at a *time* that they&#8217;re eager to &#8220;listen,&#8221; then College Confidential is a far wiser choice. </p>
<p>Yes, I do work for College Confidential, but this rant is more than just a shameless plug. I am proud that the information on the College Confidential discussion forum is often surprisingly accurate, especially for reader-generated content. But certainly the CC community could benefit from more participation by NACAC members, just as NACAC-affiliated colleges could benefit from the recruitment possibilities that CC provides. We at CC would like to see far more college officials actively participating in our discussions, helping us to offer the best information possible, and acknowledging the role that CC plays in helping many families shape their college plans.</p>
<p>This study that you cite spotlights other commercial ventures but not CC. Thus, NACAC members are missing out on an important opportunity to learn about an exceptional resource and perhaps the most effective way to reach the &#8220;Wired Generation&#8221;&#8211;better than MySpace and Facebook when it comes to connecting with the college bound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Sparkman Renz</title>
		<link>http://bluefuego.com/index.php/2009/04/facebook-vs-myspace-a-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Sparkman Renz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluefuego.com/?p=237#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised at all - the audiences of MySpace and Facebook were designed to two different demographics. Back in 2007 the BBC ran a story about the difference between the sites: 

BBC study on MySpace vs. Facebook, June 26, 2007.
Highlights from 6-month study of the networking sites:
1. More users from background of college-tradition, wealthier, non-immigrant &amp; non-minority kids on Facebook
2. MySpace is more working class family, high-school completed, immigrant, Latino &amp; Hispanic

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/6236628.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised at all &#8211; the audiences of MySpace and Facebook were designed to two different demographics. Back in 2007 the BBC ran a story about the difference between the sites: </p>
<p>BBC study on MySpace vs. Facebook, June 26, 2007.<br />
Highlights from 6-month study of the networking sites:<br />
1. More users from background of college-tradition, wealthier, non-immigrant &amp; non-minority kids on Facebook<br />
2. MySpace is more working class family, high-school completed, immigrant, Latino &amp; Hispanic</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/6236628.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/6236628.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://bluefuego.com/index.php/2009/04/facebook-vs-myspace-a-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluefuego.com/?p=237#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Nothing really surprising in the spreadsheet data--facebook is where the action is for college students (and prospective students as well as alumni) now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing really surprising in the spreadsheet data&#8211;facebook is where the action is for college students (and prospective students as well as alumni) now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
